1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 24 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Forte (195 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Mustang | Forte |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1232 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 52 L |