1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 248 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2.

Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (137 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Mustang 2010 Mazda 2
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 2
Year Released 1999 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1753 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 137 Nm
Top Speed 321 km/hour 188 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 43 L