1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 1,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Mustang weights approximately 162 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Mustang (160 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (133 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Mustang | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |
