1999 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 1470 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (381 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Mustang. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Mustang. 2012 Nissan NV has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan NV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Mustang | 2012 Nissan NV | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | NV |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 6111 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2131 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3711 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |