1999 Ford O21 C vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Ford O21 C is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 64 kg more than 1999 Ford O21 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford O21 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford O21 C | 1966 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | O21 C | Cougar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4728 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2830 mm |