1999 Ford O21 C vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford O21 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford O21 C would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 208 kg more than 1999 Ford O21 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford O21 C. (178 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford O21 C.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford O21 C | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | O21 C | Tribute |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |