1999 Ford O21 C vs. 2009 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford O21 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford O21 C would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C.
Because 2009 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford O21 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford O21 C. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford O21 C.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford O21 C | 2009 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | O21 C | Titan |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 106 L |