1999 Ford O21 C vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford O21 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford O21 C would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1999 Ford O21 C. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford O21 C.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford O21 C. (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford O21 C. 1999 Ford O21 C has automatic transmission and 2012 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2012 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Ford O21 C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford O21 C | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | O21 C | Matrix |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |