1999 Ford Puma vs. 1975 TVR 3000
To start off, 1999 Ford Puma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 TVR 3000 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1999 Ford Puma.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford Puma | 1975 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Puma | 3000 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2290 mm |
