1999 Ford Puma vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 1999 Ford Puma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Honda SSM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Honda SSM would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 1998 Honda SSM is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda SSM (286 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Puma. (125 Nm). This means 1998 Honda SSM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Puma | 1998 Honda SSM | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Puma | SSM |
Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |