1999 Ford Puma vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana

To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Puma would be higher. At 3,392 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (185 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1999 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 778 kg more than 1999 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Puma. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Puma. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Puma 2005 Pontiac Montana
Make Ford Pontiac
Model Puma Montana
Year Released 1999 2005
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1388 cc 3392 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 185 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 285 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1010 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 5120 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 95 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]