1999 Ford Puma vs. 2012 Audi S3
To start off, 2012 Audi S3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S3 (261 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1999 Ford Puma. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Puma.
Because 2012 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Puma | 2012 Audi S3 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Puma | S3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |