1999 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1999 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Nissan Pulsar would be higher.
Because 1999 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Ranger | 1991 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |