1999 Ford Telstar vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1999 Ford Telstar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Telstar weights approximately 465 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Telstar | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | 323 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |