1999 Ford Telstar vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1999 Ford Telstar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Telstar (163 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Telstar weights approximately 560 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Telstar (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Telstar | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Telstar | Polo |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |