1999 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,325 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 GMC Sierra (282 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Because 1999 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 GMC Sierra (440 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 1999 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 GMC Sierra | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | UTE |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5325 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
