1999 GMC Sonoma vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 GMC Sonoma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 GMC Sonoma would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 GMC Sonoma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 GMC Sonoma (177 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 GMC Sonoma should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1999 GMC Sonoma is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 GMC Sonoma will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 GMC Sonoma (332 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 GMC Sonoma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 GMC Sonoma | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | GMC | Mazda |
| Model | Sonoma | 3 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2639 mm |
