1999 GMC Suburban vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1999 GMC Suburban is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 7,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 GMC Suburban (250 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 GMC Suburban should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2.5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 GMC Suburban weights approximately 822 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 GMC Suburban (455 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm). This means 1999 GMC Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
1999 GMC Suburban | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Suburban | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7400 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 455 Nm | 222 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3350 mm | 2700 mm |