1999 Holden Commodore vs. 2010 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Commodore (197 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Commodore. (305 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Commodore. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: