1999 Holden Commodore vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Commodore would be higher.
Because 1999 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Commodore | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Commodore | Leaf |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |