1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | Holden | Simca |
| Model | Maloo | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
