1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
| Make | Holden | Plymouth |
| Model | Maloo | Belvedere |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
