1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Renault Juva. (46 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Renault Juva.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1955 Renault Juva | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Maloo | Juva |
Year Released | 1999 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 20 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 46 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |