1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1966 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1966 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | Maloo | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
