1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. (194 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1966 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Holden | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Maloo | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
