1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Holden Belmont. (163 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Maloo | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
