1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1973 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,589 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mercury Cougar. (375 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1973 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Holden | Mercury |
Model | Maloo | Cougar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 6589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 375 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |