1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1976 Mazda Chante
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Chante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Chante would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda Chante. (40 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda Chante.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1976 Mazda Chante | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Maloo | Chante |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 30 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 40 Nm |
