1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1976 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Pontiac Firebird (563 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 1976 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1976 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Holden | Pontiac |
| Model | Maloo | Firebird |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 563 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
