1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1979 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 1979 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo. 1979 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1979 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Holden | ZIL |
Model | Maloo | 4104 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 7695 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 608 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |