1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (179 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Maloo | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
