1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1990 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1990 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | Maloo | Swift |
Year Released | 1999 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |