1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1991 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1991 Toyota Model F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Model F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1991 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Maloo | Model F |
Year Released | 1999 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1811 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |