1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (217 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Maloo | 626 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |