1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1996 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Terrano II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Terrano II would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Nissan Terrano II. (197 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Nissan Terrano II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1996 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Maloo | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
