1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1998 Mitsubishi SST
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi SST. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi SST would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. (296 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi SST. 1998 Mitsubishi SST has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Mitsubishi SST will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1998 Mitsubishi SST | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Maloo | SST |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
