1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1999 Lotec C 1000
To start off, both 1999 Holden Maloo and 1999 Lotec C 1000 were released in the same year (1999). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1999 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Holden | Lotec |
| Model | Maloo | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 5498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 843 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
