1999 Holden Maloo vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, both 1999 Holden Maloo and 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv were released in the same year (1999). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | Maloo | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
