1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2005 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2005 Holden Cruze is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Holden Cruze is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Holden Maloo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Holden Cruze will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Cruze. (138 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Holden Maloo | 2005 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Maloo | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque | 542 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
