1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | Maloo | 75 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 215 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |