1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (392 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | Maloo | Lancer |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 392 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |