1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Maloo | 3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 181 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |