1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (137 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Holden Maloo 2010 Mazda 2
Make Holden Mazda
Model Maloo 2
Year Released 1999 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5699 cc 1498 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 102 HP
Torque 542 Nm 137 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]