1999 Holden Maloo vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 6. 2012 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1999 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 1999 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Maloo | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Maloo | 6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5699 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 542 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |