1999 Holden Nova vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Nova would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 2. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1999 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 2 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Holden Nova | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Nova | 2 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2489 mm |