1999 Honda HR-V vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Honda HR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1999 Honda HR-V. (113 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda HR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 60 kg more than 1999 Honda HR-V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda HR-V. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Honda HR-V | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Honda | Toyota |
| Model | HR-V | Celica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1672 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2640 mm |
