1999 Honda Z vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1999 Honda Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1999 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda Z weights approximately 45 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1999 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Riley Kestrel (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda Z. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Honda Z | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Honda | Riley |
| Model | Z | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2380 mm |
