1999 Honda Z vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1999 Honda Z is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1999 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1999 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Honda Z weights approximately 95 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1999 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Honda Z. (61 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Honda Z | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | Z | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2420 mm |