1999 Jaguar XJ vs. 2012 Proton Satria
To start off, 2012 Proton Satria is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jaguar XJ (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2012 Proton Satria. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Satria. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 551 kg more than 2012 Proton Satria. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XJ (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Satria. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Satria. 1999 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2012 Proton Satria has manual transmission. 2012 Proton Satria will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jaguar XJ | 2012 Proton Satria | |
Make | Jaguar | Proton |
Model | XJ | Satria |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3996 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |