1999 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 370Z is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jaguar XK (450 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2009 Nissan 370Z. (327 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan 370Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XK (604 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan 370Z. (270 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1999 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan 370Z. 1999 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan 370Z has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan 370Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Jaguar XK | 2009 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | 370Z |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 604 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |